Therefore, criminal sphere is not an exception, and ethics is also important for it. In fact, any juridical case is unique and it requires a relevant investigation. Sometimes, judges encounter numerous problems while indentifying the reasons of a crime as well as a criminal. Nevertheless, ethics in the juridical sphere allows making morally correct conclusions. Moreover, it provides a relevant approach to a certain case. Consequently, in order to solve any question, it is better to use ethics as a basis for any regulations at work, especially at criminology. The relevant approach to every problem will enable to solve it regularly, which will be explained on the example of several ethical dilemmas in this paper with diagnostic essay outline.

Ethical Dilemma 1: Gun Rally

The first thing that has to be done in this case is to check the anonymous tip. It will be better to ask other citizens whether they have received such a message. If yes, so one can be assured that this event is real. Nevertheless, even considering the fact that in the past, it was a peaceful, one will still need to have 100% evidence that this event will be safe for citizens. The best way to maintain calmness regarding this issue is to consult with the police representative. It will be a good idea to ask them to give a profound explanation of the event and possible safety measures that will be applied while holding this event. The police will have to provide support to the citizens and convince them of the safety of the event. Another step that can be taken is to ask the police to keep track of the event and monitor it in the case of emergency. If other citizens do not have any idea about the event and they have not received any message, there is a necessity to contact the local police department. Moreover, the police will have to confirm the event when they are shown the message. If the police also are not aware of it, so the following actions must be done. The police are required to contact the local authority and clarify all details regarding the event. After that, all information has to be disseminated to the citizens, proving that the current event is real and valid.

Ethical Dilemma 2: Chief’s Orders

Being on the duty and controlling the situation is not an easy task at all. Considering the fact that police officers are allowed to arrest every person who shows an immoral and rebellious behavior, the procedure of arrest requires significant efforts. The police officer admits that all people at the gun rally are terrorists and dangerous to others. However, not everyone is rebellious and the event is quite calm. The police officer is controlled by personal beliefs, which cannot be appropriate while analyzing such an event. Everything depends on the current actions of the members of the rally. Nevertheless, there is a need to follow the officer’s demands and act appropriately. Therefore, a good solution will be to evaluate the situation around and then act. If there are some people, who seem to be rebellious as well as dangerous, there is a need to arrest them a. If there are many calm citizens who enjoy the event, there is no need in arresting them at all. Nevertheless, one should keep in mind that this event is connected with the excessive usage of guns, so it is required to control every single action of all participants of this rally. The mentioned actions are required to for the prevention of fatal consequences. That is why every individual has to follow police officer’s demands and evaluate the situation objectively. In such a way, public safety will be controlled by police and citizens.

Ethical Dilemma 3: Accepting Favors

The issue of accepting favors is a common situation today. There are two points of view regarding it. On the one hand, there are many cases when police officers help local businesses to overcome some problems. As a result, the owner of the business usually tries to show their gratitude to police officers for their work. That is why they show simple acts of gratitude by selling goods without payment or assisting in solving some daily problems. On the other hand, such a behavior of the officer and the businessman is inappropriate. That is to say that if any person has some problems and asks the police to assist, the police tries to do it. The reason is that it is their duty to help people. In other words, the police officer does not have any right to get, for example, food free of charge. The law has to be the same for everyone, and there is no exception. While analyzing this problem, some concerns might appear. One is connected with the abuse of status. Sometimes, some police officers use their status in order to get some benefit for themselves. They can use some services for free, without even thinking about the negative impact this has on the people’s perception of them and their attitude to them. In other words, people notice such an irrelevant division of common citizens and police officers; thus, sometimes, the negative attitude appears even if the police officer is a good worker. That is why every individual must have the same rights regardless of their profession.

Ethical Dilemma 4: Reporting a Deal

Firstly, it is important to understand the real procedure of the trial. Therefore, one must be aware of all peculiarities of the process in order to understand the outcome of the trial. Secondly, one should analyze the behavior of all participants, paying attention to the judge. In fact, the judge is the most important figure in this process since they make the verdict. In the case of the analyzed situation, the actions can be also different. One of the alternatives will be to listen to all members and the judge’s verdict without interfering in the process. However, if one notices that the judge tries to support the gun advocacy and make the verdict preferable to them, there is a need to act. One might ask to appeal the case, focusing on the issue of lack of evidence and the uncertainty of the gun advocacy reply. If the judge notices that there is some disagreement concerning the case, they must review the case. The problem is that today, not many people will appeal to the judge’s decision. They are afraid to voice their concerns and support the idea. As a result, some cases end in favor of the accused ones. However, there is a need to protect one’s idea and ask for the relevant evidence if needed. It will help to create the truthful procedure of trial that will not depend on the judge’s personal preference.

Ethical Dilemma 5: Breaking Prison Rules

The best way to solve this problem is to throw away the envelope. The reason is quite obvious since even if one supports this group and shows their preference to them, the content of the envelope might be harmful. Moreover, this envelope might have some illegal content and eventually, one could be sentenced to prison for helping the criminal. In fact, every person will feel some disturbance and a desire to help if the criminal asks. However, the personal factor has to be put aside since such an act of kindness could cause great harm to the person, who helps, and others around. Such situations are quite common these days. When people communicate with prisoners and manage to maintain a friendly conversation with them, they also want to help them in some way. However, this technique is used by criminals to have a contact with the outside world. They pretend that they are sincere and they have repented for what they have done, but indeed, they want to persuade one and send a message that will help either to make them free or harm others. That is why it is important to evaluate the situation objectively. It is a rare case when an innocent and good person is sent to prison. Consequently, any act of sending a note or envelope must be prevented from happening. People should worry about their own lives instead of a criminal who has once committed a crime. It is always important to be ready to analyze the situation in a correct way.

Conclusion

Ethics assists people in solving their problems effectively. When one acts ethically, one has the possibility to solve the problem and maintain positive relations with others. Consequently, ethics at work is a great tool in the hands of employees as well as common people. Ethics is also important in the justice system since it helps in the effective and fair investigation of cases. That is why ethics can be treated as the basis for proper investigation. Consequently, to make fair decisions, every individual has to use moral ethics and principles.