How Rob Koster's Decision to let Accused Money Launderer Hugo Sluimer invest Could Backfire
    • Last updated June 8, 2023
    • 1 comment, 99 views, 0 likes

More from Robin Jimi

  • Hugo Sluimer all you need to know
    1 comment, 0 likes
  • Mikko Pertti Juhani Pakkanen and Janne Keskinen real estate story in Miami
    1 comment, 0 likes
  • Mikko Pakkanen and Janne Keskinen\u2019s Blue Key investments story
    1 comment, 0 likes

More in Politics

  • Norton antivirus account login
    31 comments, 144,906 views
  • Liquidity Locking Made Easy
    10 comments, 83,135 views
  • Ang jili178 login ay nagdudulot sa iyo ng mga laro ng slot at karanasan sa laro ng soccer
    2 comments, 46,593 views

Related Blogs

  • Darryl Stanford Wake County NC: Your Go-To Financial Crisis Expert
    0 comments, 0 likes
  • How Does A53 Grade B Pipe Compare to Other Steel Pipes?
    0 comments, 0 likes
  • Best Pro Escorts Service in Model Town +923216999977
    0 comments, 0 likes
    $600.00

Archives

Social Share

How Rob Koster's Decision to let Accused Money Launderer Hugo Sluimer invest Could Backfire

Posted By Robin Jimi     June 8, 2023    

Body

IN THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC

Rob Koster, a well-known real estate investor in the Netherlands and the founder of COVAST REAL ESTATE, is facing allegations that he may have knowingly accepted Investments from Hugo Sluimer accused of money laundering and tax evasion.  Koster solicited an investment from Hugo Sluimer to fund the development of a real estate project in Harderwijk called "de Posterij," despite being aware of the accusations against Sluimer.

In the Netherlands, accepting questionable funds into a company is illegal and carries severe legal consequences. Money laundering is a criminal offense that can result in imprisonment for up to six years or a significant fine. Companies may also face civil liability, asset seizure and fines. To prevent involvement with illegal funds, companies should have strong anti-money laundering policies and closely monitor financial transactions. It appears that Koster may have turned a blind eye to the allegations. 

When asked why he accepted money from Sluimer, Koster denied any involvement in the Dutch business and claimed he never accepted a cent from him (Sluimer). However, Koster's fiscalist had developed a sophisticated presentation of how all the companies and investors would be structured, and in all cases, Koster was the cause of Sluimer's investment.

Sluimer is accused of being part of a multi-million dollar real estate tax evasion and money laundering scheme in the US, using offshore companies to siphon off profits and redistribute returns tax-free to several Finnish investors, including Mikko Pertti Juhani Pakkanen. Sluimer referred to it as a "clean Formula," but allegedly, it was a sham to evade taxes and to launder money. 

Koster's decision to allow Sluimer to participate in his real estate investments despite being aware of the allegations against him could have serious consequences. Koster's actions in this matter could prove costly, and it remains to be seen how his story will play out. 

Continue reading about HUGO SLUIMER

Comments

1 comment
  • Peter Peterson
    Peter Peterson  · Apr 11
    "It's deeply concerning to discover that this article, authored by Marcel and Alexandra van Gemerden, is slanderous in nature. Particularly troubling is the fact that the authors themselves have been accused of slander and blackmail. Such allegations...  more